A new Business of Fashion and McKinsey study shows emotional connection now outweighs logo visibility in luxury purchase decisions. This article examines that shift, the differences between markets such as the US and China, and what it means for brands and for those responsible for textile production.<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
For a long time, luxury spoke an easy language to recognize visible logos, limited editions, restricted access. Showing was enough to communicate value.<\/p>\n
That grammar is becoming outdated. A recent study by the Business of Fashion and McKinsey & Company, “The State of Fashion: Face to Face With Luxury Clients” (2026),<\/i> paints a picture of the luxury consumer that no longer matches the industry’s classic playbook.<\/p>\n
Less status, more meaning<\/strong><\/p>\n According to the research, attributes that guaranteed differentiation for decades, such as brand visibility or the ability to signal social standing, are losing ground. In the United States, for example, purchase criteria are shifting towards self-expression and alignment between the brand’s values and the client’s own values.<\/p>\n This doesn’t mean the end of exclusivity. It means exclusivity has become more subtle, more personal, and harder to replicate at scale.<\/p>\n Experience has become the real product<\/strong><\/p>\n The study’s second point is even more decisive for those working on the production and brand side. The value that the most sophisticated clients attach to a luxury item no longer ends with the purchase. It continues in the service, in access to exclusive content and events, in the technical knowledge the brand shares, in the feeling of belonging to something rare.<\/p>\n An excellent product is no longer enough to justify the price. It’s the experience around it, often invisible to the end consumer, that sustains that perceived value. And that experience begins long before the shop window, in how the piece is designed, produced and followed through.<\/p>\n A global consumer, with local logic<\/strong><\/p>\n The study also compares two of the sector’s biggest growth engines, the United States and China, showing there’s no universal formula. In the US, individuality carries more weight. In China, the emotional dimension is growing, but coexists with social recognition factors that remain central.<\/p>\n For European brands, the lesson is clear. Sustained growth means keeping a coherent identity globally, without ignoring the nuances of each market.<\/p>\n What this changes for luxury producers<\/strong><\/p>\n This shift has direct implications for the whole value chain, including whoever secures production. When the purchase criterion stops being purely visual and starts including provenance, traceability and execution quality, production stops being an invisible cost and becomes part of the story the brand tells.<\/p>\n That’s also why more European brands are strengthening proximity to their production centres. Not just for logistical efficiency, but because that proximity allows finer control over exactly what differentiates luxury today: detail, follow-through, and coherence between what’s promised and what’s delivered.<\/p>\n Relational luxury<\/strong><\/p>\n Perhaps the most honest conclusion of this study is a simple one. Luxury is ceasing to be a statement and becoming a relationship. The brands that keep growing won’t necessarily be the most visible, but the ones that manage to turn clients into communities and products into experiences remembered long after the purchase.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Source<\/b><\/b><\/p>\n Business of Fashion & McKinsey & Company, “The State of Fashion: Face to Face With Luxury Clients” (2026).<\/i><\/i><\/p>\n Additional reporting: Retail Times, “The Business of Fashion and McKinsey release latest report in The State of Fashion Series” (2026).<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A new Business of Fashion and McKinsey study shows emotional connection now outweighs logo visibility in luxury purchase decisions. This article examines that shift, the differences between markets such as the US and China, and what it means for brands and for those responsible for textile production. For a long time, luxury spoke an […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":64984,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64983","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-noticias"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64983","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64983"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64983\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64986,"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64983\/revisions\/64986"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64984"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64983"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/performancebyhm.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}